Section 2: What’s New in Veterinary Oncology
Top 3 Takeaways
- Veterinary oncology is rapidly advancing, with novel therapeutics providing general practitioners and specialists with a growing arsenal of evidence-based tools to manage cancer, emphasizing individualized care and thoughtful selection of treatment strategies tailored to each patient.
- Given the constantly evolving market and absence of oversight of cancer screening tests, it is crucial to assess the validity of such diagnostics before adopting their use.
- Knowing the risks, benefits, costs, and FDA approval or US Department of Agriculture (USDA) licensing status of new oncology drugs is critical to using them appropriately and successfully.
Tremendous growth has occurred in diagnostic and therapeutic offerings in veterinary oncology. Additionally, direct-to-consumer advertising has increased client awareness of these options, which clients then want to discuss with primary care veterinarians. Veterinarians must recognize that regulatory oversight of marketing for veterinary diagnostic tests and many treatments is limited. A wide range of scientific levels of evidence for reliability and efficacy of products exists. Careful review of peer-reviewed publications regarding new tests or therapeutics and weighing the potential costs versus proven benefits of any new offering is crucial. In addition, with new veterinary drugs, it is important to understand the FDA’s designation for drugs that have received conditional approval and how it affects the drug’s use (see Box: Key Points About Conditionally Approved Drugs). Some products, such as vaccines, are regulated by the USDA (see Box: USDA Regulation of Biologics). Staying informed on licensing and approval regulations ensures that veterinarians provide safe, effective cancer care while avoiding legal risks.
Diagnostics
Many veterinary cancer screening tests are marketed with the stated goals of helping detect and treat cancer early. Assessing the efficacy of such tests requires understanding positive and negative predictive values and how disease prevalence affects those values. At this time, no blood or urine test can conclusively rule in or rule out cancer in a veterinary patient, so these tests must be used with caution to avoid providing a false sense of security or causing undue alarm. Studies are ongoing for some of these tests, with the hope of identifying more precise and accurate ways to leverage them for the benefit of patients.
Two new types of tests have emerged that are intended to aid in cancer diagnosis and treatment:
- Liquid biopsy. These blood or urine tests detect substances that may be used as biomarkers and are intended to diagnose, screen for, or monitor cancer.
- Personalized/precision medicine profiles. These blood and tumor sample tests use various forms of biologic tumor profiling, which are intended to identify treatments that the tumor may be most susceptible to based on its genome rather than its histology (tumor type).
These are exciting developments; however, at this time, insufficient data exists to conclude whether these tests meaningfully improve outcomes in animals. General practitioners and specialists should be aware of the data and limitations of these tests before recommending or interpreting them.1
Choose cancer diagnostic tests and methods wisely. In contrast to drugs, minimal to no regulatory approval process exists for veterinary cancer diagnostics and medical devices. Accordingly, a product’s presence in the marketplace does not establish that it has demonstrated accuracy or patient benefit.
Key Points About Conditionally Approved Drugs
Conditional approval is a regulatory pathway granted by the FDA for veterinary drugs that have demonstrated complete and acceptable safety and have a “reasonable expectation of effectiveness” when they are used according to the label.2
Under this designation, it is a violation of federal law to use these products in a manner other than what is specified on their label. Therefore, during the time a drug is sold under conditional approval, extralabel use is illegal. Extralabel is allowed only for drugs that are fully approved. Because more than 90% of drugs used in veterinary oncology are not approved in veterinary species and thus are used extralabel, the legal limitations in using conditionally approved drugs are often, and understandably, missed.
An FDA conditionally approved (CA) drug is noted by the drug’s trade name followed by CA and a number (DRUG NAME-CA1). For example, CA1 indicates that it is the first CA application for that drug, and CA2 indicates a second CA application for that drug. If a CA drug receives full FDA approval, the CA notation and number are no longer listed. During the conditional approval period, these drugs can be legally marketed and prescribed. This allows veterinarians earlier access to promising medications for conditions where fully approved alternatives do not exist. If the effectiveness standard for full approval is not shown within 5 years, the drug can no longer be sold.
USDA Regulation of Biologics
The USDA regulates biologics (e.g., vaccines, monoclonal antibodies) used in veterinary oncology, whereas the FDA oversees chemical-based drugs. USDA-licensed products, such as the Oncept canine melanoma vaccine and gilvetmab (anti-programmed cell death protein [PD-1] monoclonal antibody), are often restricted to specific indications and may be available only through specialists.
USDA-regulated biologics offer valuable options for hard-to-treat cancers, but their efficacy data may be less extensive. Veterinarians must critically assess available evidence and consult specialists as needed. Compliance involves adhering to label instructions and maintaining treatment records. These products enhance therapeutic choices but require careful consideration of their regulatory restrictions and clinical applications.
Newer Therapeutics
Systemic therapies
Rabacfosadine 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 is fully approved by the FDA to treat canine lymphoma. It is a double prodrug of a nucleotide analog that inhibits DNA synthesis by inhibiting DNA polymerases. The drug is administered as a 30-minute IV infusion, given once every 3 weeks for up to five doses. It is generally well tolerated, with gastrointestinal (GI) upset and neutropenia being the main side effects; cutaneous reactions and pulmonary fibrosis are less common but also of note. Publications describe its use in rescue therapy and naive lymphomas. It may also be combined in multidrug protocols. As it is a fully approved drug, extralabel use is permitted. In early studies, dogs with multiple myeloma showed strong therapeutic responses.12
Verdinexor 13,14,15,16 is FDA conditionally approved to treat canine lymphoma. It is a selective inhibitor of nuclear export. It is given orally twice a week. Adverse reactions include anorexia, vomiting, diarrhea, and lethargy. In the initial approval study, all 58 dogs had at least one adverse reaction, and 36% of dogs had a severe or life-threatening reaction.17 Response rates are limited, and studies are ongoing for full FDA approval.
Crofelemer-CA1 is conditionally approved for managing chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in dogs.18 Crofelemer-CA1 is an oral antisecretory medication used to manage chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in dogs by regulating chloride and water secretion in the GI tract. It works locally in the gut and is minimally absorbed systemically.
Gilvetmab is a caninized monoclonal antibody against canine PD-1, which leads to a decrease in tumor-induced immune suppression and thus improves the immune system’s ability to destroy cancer cells.19 It is conditionally licensed by the USDA for use in dogs with mast cell tumors (MCTs) or melanomas and is available only through veterinary specialists practicing oncology. Studies are ongoing for full licensure.
Cell therapies (e.g., adoptive cell therapy, ELIAS cancer immunotherapy, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) are another growing area for cancer treatment, and further research needs to be done. 20,21,22
Autologous cancer vaccines (e.g., Torigen) represent a personalized immunotherapeutic approach by using a patient’s own tumor
tissue to stimulate an immune response. Although they are appealing because of their individualized nature and ease of administration, there remains limited peer-reviewed evidence supporting their efficacy in veterinary oncology. Further research is needed to better understand their clinical benefit, mechanisms of action, and potential role within a multimodal treatment plan.
Local therapies
Tigilanol tiglate 23,24,25 is an FDA-approved local therapy for nonmetastatic canine MCTs. Cutaneous tumors anywhere on the body can be treated. To treat subcutaneous tumors, they must be located at or distal to the elbow or hock. Restrictions for use also exist for tumor size and total dose. Injection is restricted to intratumoral (avoiding the margins, periphery, and deep to the tumor) and leads to hemorrhagic necrosis of the tumor. Wound healing is usually complete within 4–8 weeks.
Electrochemotherapy 26,27,28,29,30,31 is another area of research and growth in local tumor treatment. A special unit generates an electrical field to increase cancer cell permeability, which can enhance chemotherapeutic efficacy.
The 2026 AAHA Oncology Guidelines for Dogs and Cats are generously supported by CareCredit, Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Merck Animal Health, and Zoetis.
Citations
- Chon E, Hendricks W, White M, Rodrigues L, Haworth D, Post G. Precision medicine in veterinary science. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2024;54(3):501–21.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Conditional approval explained: a resource for veterinarians. FDA.gov 9/17/2020. Available at https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/resources-you/conditional-approval-explained-resource-veterinarians. Accessed May 8, 2025
- Breit MN, Kisseberth WC, Bear MD, et al. Biologic activity of the novel orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) KPT-335 against canine melanoma cell lines. BMC Vet Res 2014;10:160.
- Cawley JR, Wright ZM, Meleo K, et al. Concurrent use of rabacfosadine and L-asparaginase for relapsed or refractory multicentric lymphoma in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2020;34(2):882–9.
- London CA, Bernabe LF, Barnard S, et al. Preclinical evaluation of the novel, orally bioavailable Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) KPT-335 in spontaneous canine cancer: results of a phase I study. PLoS One 2014;9(2):e87585.
- Saba CF, Clifford C, Burgess K, et al. Rabacfosadine for naive canine intermediate to large cell lymphoma: Efficacy and adverse event profile across three prospective clinical trials. Vet Comp Oncol 2020;18(4):763–9.
- Saba CF, Vickery KR, Clifford CA, et al. Rabacfosadine for relapsed canine B-cell lymphoma: Efficacy and adverse event profiles of 2 different doses. Vet Comp Oncol 2018;16(1):E76–E82.
- Sadowski AR, Gardner HL, Borgatti A, et al. Phase II study of the oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) KPT-335 (verdinexor) in dogs with lymphoma. BMC Vet Res 2018;14(1):250.
- Thamm DH, Vail DM, Post GS, et al. Alternating rabacfosadine/doxorubicin: efficacy and tolerability in naive canine multicentric lymphoma. J Vet Intern Med 2017;31(3):872–8.
- Vlodaver EM, Keating MK, Bidot WA, et al. Efficacy of verdinexor for the treatment of naive canine epitheliotropic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: An open-label pilot study. Vet Dermatol 2024;35(5):536–46.
- Weishaar KM, Wright ZM, Rosenberg MP, et al. Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of rabacfosadine in dogs with lymphoma. J Vet Intern Med 2022;36(1):215–26.
- Thamm DH, Vail DM, Kurzman ID, et al. GS-9219/VDC-1101–a prodrug of the acyclic nucleotide PMEG has antitumor activity in spontaneous canine multiple myeloma. BMC Vet Res 2014;10:30.
- Breit MN, Kisseberth WC, Bear MD, et al. Biologic activity of the novel orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) KPT-335 against canine melanoma cell lines. BMC Vet Res 2014;10:160.
- London CA, Bernabe LF, Barnard S, et al. Preclinical evaluation of the novel, orally bioavailable Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) KPT-335 in spontaneous canine cancer: results of a phase I study. PLoS One 2014;9(2):e87585.
- Sadowski AR, Gardner HL, Borgatti A, et al. Phase II study of the oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) KPT-335 (verdinexor) in dogs with lymphoma. BMC Vet Res 2018;14(1):250.
- Vlodaver EM, Keating MK, Bidot WA, et al. Efficacy of verdinexor for the treatment of naive canine epitheliotropic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: An open-label pilot study. Vet Dermatol 2024;35(5):536–46.
- Sadowski AR, Gardner HL, Borgatti A, et al. Phase II study of the oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) KPT-335 (verdinexor) in dogs with lymphoma. BMC Vet Res 2018;14(1):250.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA conditionally approves first oral tablet to treat chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in dogs. December 21, 2021. Fda.gov. Available at https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-conditionally-approves-first-oral-tablet-treatchemotherapy- induced-diarrhea-dogs. Accessed July 23, 2025.
- Gilvetmab [package insert]. Rahway, New Jersey: Merck Animal Health. Available at https://merckusa.cvpservice.com/product/basic/view/1047586. Accessed July 23, 2025.
- Cockery JR, Leifer CA. Racing CARs to veterinary immuno-oncology. Front Vet Sci 2023:10(2):1130182.
- Xia YY, Chi KH, Liao AT, et al. Limited clinical efficacy with potential adverse events in a pilot study of autologous adoptive cell therapy for canine oral malignant melanoma. Vet Sci 2024;11(4):150.
- McCafferty C. USDA approves new canine cancer therapy. DVM360. March 19, 2025. Available at https://www.dvm360.com/view/usda-approvesnew-canine-cancer-therapy. Accessed July 23, 2025.
- De Ridder TR, Campbell JE, Burke-Schwarz C, et al. Randomized controlled clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of intratumoral treatment of canine mast cell tumors with tigilanol tiglate (EBC-46). J Vet InternMed 2021;35(1):415–29.
- Jones PD, Campbell JE, Brown G, et al. Recurrence-free interval 12 months after local treatment of mast cell tumors in dogs using intratumoral injection of tigilanol tiglate. J Vet Intern Med 2021;35(1):451–5.
- Reddell P, De Ridder TR, Morton JM, et al. Wound formation, wound size, and progression of wound healing after intratumoral treatment of mast cell tumors in dogs with tigilanol tiglate. J Vet Intern Med 2021; 35(1):430–41.
- de Castro Cunha RM, Lavalle GE, Nunes FC, et al. Canine squamous cell carcinoma: Electrochemotherapy association with surgery and correlation with overall survival. Vet Comp Oncol 2023;21(2):240–54.
- Dos Anjos DS, Bueno C, Magalh~aes LF, et al. Electrochemotherapy induces tumor regression and decreases the proliferative index in canine cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 2019;9(1):15819.
- Moretti G, Dentini A, Beccati F, et al. Palliative repeated electroporations of oral tumors in dogs: A case series. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:1004811.
- Ramos SC, Dias-Pereira P, LuÍs AL, et al. Electrochemotherapy in dogs and cats-A review. Vet Comp Oncol 2024;22(3):311–21.
- Santos Dos Anjos D, Rossi YA, Sierra OR, et al. Outcome following curative-intent electrochemotherapy for extramedullary plasmacytoma in dogs – case reports. Top Companion Anim Med 2020;40:100441.
- Tellado M, Mir LM, Maglietti F. Veterinary guidelines for electrochemotherapy of superficial tumors. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:868989.